Three campaigns, with the strategy and the analytics behind each. Also an honest note about what they are: high-ticket B2B and e-commerce, running on the same economics as SaaS, plus our own software ranked in public.
Our flagship campaigns are high-ticket B2B and e-commerce, not named SaaS logos. We could dress them up as SaaS. We would rather tell you what they are and let you judge whether the economics transfer.
They do, in our view: long consideration cycles, high lifetime value, and a buyer who researches thoroughly before contacting sales. The plays. Bottom-funnel pages, technical remediation, earned authority, are the same ones we would run on your software. We are also running them on PRWiz, our own product, in public.
Each with the strategy, the sequence and the numbers.
A firm where each lead is worth $10K–$100K, competing against decade-old legal domains. We won it on bottom-funnel intent rather than volume: linkable resource assets first, then guest placements and niche edits, then a skyscraper campaign displacing competitor citations, then entity and NLP work that produced the top-3 surge. Ended at #2 for the keyword buyers use immediately before choosing a firm.
A premium at-home waxing brand in a niche dominated by legacy players with deep content libraries. Won with the full stack rather than one tactic: 100+ technical errors fixed including crawl-blocking double-slash URLs, 99 existing posts rewritten for intent, nine product pages restructured with schema, and 54 earned links. Product pages became the category authority, which is where the revenue sat.
Forrest Webber had 20 sites and a stack of freelancers, writers, link builders, WordPress VAs, on different schedules with different quality bars. We absorbed five workstreams into one team: content strategy per site, advanced link building, technical audits, WordPress management and reporting. Featured on Niche Pursuits.
Same table, same columns, so the differences in starting position and timeframe are visible rather than buried in three separate write-ups.
| Campaign | Category | Timeframe | Headline result | What was built |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immigration service provider | High-ticket B2B services | 16 months | +6,600% organic traffic, 1,114 top-3 keywords | 294 links, linkable assets, entity and NLP work |
| Wellness brand | E-commerce | 6 months | +168% organic clicks, 58→757 top-3 keywords | 54 links, 99 posts rewritten, 100+ technical fixes |
| Niche portfolio | Portfolio operations | Multi-year | 500K→1.2M monthly visitors, 140% revenue growth | 20 sites, five workstreams absorbed into one team |
Starting position differs in every row, and a percentage from a small base is easier than the same percentage from a large one. That is why the absolute figures sit beside the percentages.
Client dashboards behind two of the campaigns above. Client identity is removed from every capture, which is why there is no domain in any header. Each caption states the tool, the exact date range shown in the image, and the metric plotted.
The CTR line in that capture is the one an SEO-literate reader will stop on, so here is why it fell. Clicks grew roughly 2.7 times, from 26.5K to 71.8K, while impressions grew roughly 4.3 times, from 1.19M to 5.12M. The site had started surfacing for a far wider set of head terms it previously did not appear for at all, most of them lower on the page, so the denominator grew faster than the numerator and the average fell from 2.2% to 1.4%. Average position improved from 18.6 to 15 across the same comparison. The full working is on the ecommerce case study.
Forrest Webber is the client behind the portfolio engagement above. His review is reproduced here exactly as written.
I am so glad we found Authority Magnet for our portfolio. No more going through countless services, paying an arm and a leg for link building or the frustration of running an in-house campaign. They handle all!
While Mohammad and his team focus on providing world-class link building services, I can focus on what I do best! Win-Win.
Verified review
All 20 client reviews, including five on camera with transcripts.
The honest gap in the case studies above is a named SaaS logo. We are closing it the only way that is not a slide: by building software and ranking it ourselves.
Reasonable question when the case studies are B2B services and e-commerce: which parts of this actually apply to software? Specifically these.
The sequencing. Linkable assets before outreach, guest placements before skyscraper work, entity and NLP refinement last once authority existed to support it. That order is why the top-3 count went from ten to over eleven hundred rather than plateauing, and the full immigration study sets out all five stages with the months each one ran. The same sequence applies directly to a SaaS category with entrenched incumbents, and the economics match, since a $10K–$100K lead behaves like an enterprise software deal.
The technical half. Over a hundred errors fixed, including crawl-blocking URL structure problems, before content work began. The lesson generalizes exactly: 99 rewritten posts would have produced nothing on a site Google could not crawl properly, and the full ecommerce study explains what the crawl problem actually was. SaaS sites carry heavier versions of the same problems through JavaScript rendering.
Operations at scale. Twenty sites with consistent quality is a production-systems problem, which is the same problem as programmatic SEO across hundreds of integration and use-case pages. The constraint is never ideas; it is a repeatable process that does not degrade at volume, and the full portfolio study lists the five workstreams that were consolidated to get there.
Trial-funnel conversion optimization and product-led content are genuinely different for software, and our named-client evidence there is thinner. That is exactly why we are building and ranking PRWiz in public rather than claiming the experience.
Case studies are marketing. Here is what ours leave out, so you can weigh them properly.
Ask us what we think is realistic for your category, your domain and your competitive set, and ask what would have to be true for it to fail. That conversation is more useful than any figure on this page.
Tell us the category and the competitors. We will tell you what we think is realistic, including when the honest answer is not much.
From $5,000/mo · Realistic targets, stated before you sign