The best digital PR agencies
Ten agencies compared for earned media and links. Two are ours and disclosed below, we rank first only for software, and we name a competitor best overall. Four of the lists currently ranking for this term put themselves first without saying so.
Authority Magnet publishes this list and appears in it, ranked first only for B2B software while Fractl is named best overall, because for data-led campaigns they genuinely are. PRWiz is operated by the same parent company under a separate team and sits at number five, below three competitors, because placement supply and journalist pitching are different disciplines and this category is the second one. The assessment draws on campaigns we have run, coverage we have earned and failed to earn, and the published pricing where agencies disclose it. Worth knowing as you read: four of the lists currently ranking for this term place their own agency first without disclosing anything at all, one of them scoring itself 97 out of 100 on a methodology it invented.
What do digital PR agencies actually do?
Digital PR agencies pitch journalists with stories, data or expert commentary to earn coverage that carries links and brand mentions. Retainers run $5,000 to $30,000 a month, and nobody can guarantee coverage.
The category splits in two and buyers confuse them constantly. Traditional PR firms optimize for reputation and clip counts. SEO-driven digital PR optimizes for coverage that also passes authority. Both call themselves digital PR; only one is measured on referring domains.
Work out which of the two you are buying
Quoting a traditional PR firm against an SEO-led one produces two proposals that were never comparable.
| Traditional and brand PR | SEO-driven digital PR | |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | Reputation and awareness | Coverage that also passes authority |
| Measured in | Clips, reach, share of voice | Referring domains, rankings, AI citations |
| Typical story | Launches, executives, milestones | Original data and research |
| Cares about links | Often not at all | Central to the brief |
| Who does it here | Idea Grove, PRLab, Thrive | Fractl, Digital Third Coast, Siege, us |
The 10 best digital PR agencies
Each entry names the situation it suits. Where a competitor is the better answer, that is written in their entry rather than left out.
Authority Magnet
Our agency, and the claim is narrow: best for software companies, not best overall. For general consumer campaigns Fractl below is stronger and we would say so on a call. Where we fit is B2B software, where the story that earns coverage is usually operational data the client already has rather than a survey commissioned for the purpose, and where the placements that matter are category roundups and comparison pages as much as national media. We also track whether coverage changed anything inside AI answers, which almost nobody in this category does yet.
Strengths
- Coverage angles built from client product data rather than commissioned surveys
- AI citation share tracked across seven engines before and after a campaign
- Published pricing, rare in a category that quotes on request
- Own publisher platform for the syndication layer beneath earned coverage
Where they are weaker
- Narrow: B2B software and high-ticket B2B, not consumer brands
- No national broadcast relationships. We earn trade and category coverage
- Small roster, so availability is limited
Fractl
Fractl effectively wrote the modern digital PR playbook, and the campaigns they publish still set the standard for turning original research into national coverage. If your goal is volume of high-authority earned links from a single campaign, they are the strongest option on this list and it is not particularly close. Expensive, and correct when the budget supports one big idea executed properly.
Strengths
- The most consistent record of converting research into national coverage
- Genuine relationships with top-tier publications
- Publishes methodology, so the work is checkable
Where they are weaker
- Among the most expensive here
- Campaign model, so results are lumpy rather than steady
- Generalist by design rather than vertical-specific
Digital Third Coast
Runs a similar data-study model to Fractl at a more accessible price, and is candid about the hit rate, which matters in a category where nobody guarantees coverage. A sensible first choice if you want the research-led approach without a top-tier retainer.
Strengths
- Strong data-study execution at mid-market pricing
- Realistic about campaign hit rates
- Combines PR with SEO thinking rather than treating them separately
Where they are weaker
- Fewer top-tier relationships than Fractl
- Campaign-based, so slower to show a trend
- Limited technical B2B depth
Siege Media
Less a PR agency than a content agency whose assets earn coverage, which is a genuinely different bet: instead of one campaign spiking and fading, you build pages that accumulate links for years. Slower to show results and more durable when it works.
Strengths
- The strongest linkable asset production on this list
- Compounding rather than spiking results
- Large stable team with senior oversight
Where they are weaker
- Slow by design, so wrong for a launch window
- Expensive
- Not media relations in the traditional sense
PRWiz
Also ours, and placed here rather than higher for a reason we have written on every other page: a marketplace cannot pitch a journalist, and pitching is what digital PR is. What it does do is solve the timing problem. A pitched campaign might land in week three or not at all, and teams with a launch date need coverage that is certain. PRWiz gives you that floor, 6,000+ vetted publishers with live traffic and known pricing, and syndication for a story once it has landed. Use it alongside a pitched campaign, not instead of one.
Strengths
- Certain placement dates, which pitching can never promise
- Live traffic and verified pricing before you commit
- Useful for syndicating a story after it earns coverage
Where they are weaker
- Placement supply is the core strength; pitched coverage is a separate service line
- Placements are paid, so they are not earned media and should not be reported as such
- No campaign strategy or creative
PRLab
Serves more than 200 clients across the US, EU and MENA, with genuine B2B technology depth and unusually explicit KPI tracking for a PR firm. The obvious choice if you need coverage in European trade press as well as US, which most agencies on this list cannot deliver.
Strengths
- Real multi-market coverage, especially European
- B2B technology specialization
- KPI tracking rather than clip counts
Where they are weaker
- Less SEO-integrated than the data-study agencies
- Pricing not published
- Smaller US media footprint than domestic firms
Go Fish Digital
Unusual in pairing digital PR with reputation work, which is the right combination when the problem is not absence of coverage but the wrong coverage ranking for your brand name. Solid technical SEO underneath, so the links they earn get pointed somewhere useful.
Strengths
- Reputation and PR handled together
- Strong technical SEO foundation
- Long track record across categories
Where they are weaker
- Less specialized in pure earned media
- Mid-market pricing
- Broad focus
Idea Grove
Closer to classical PR than most of this list: analyst relations, trade media, product launches and executive positioning for B2B technology. If you need Gartner analysts briefed rather than backlinks earned, that is a different job and this is who does it.
Strengths
- Genuine analyst relations capability
- Deep B2B technology media contacts
- Handles launches and executive positioning
Where they are weaker
- Less focused on links and SEO outcomes
- Traditional PR pricing
- Coverage may not pass link value at all
Rise at Seven
The most creatively ambitious agency here, and consistently the one producing campaigns other agencies share. Consumer and lifestyle brands get the most from this; the reactive, culturally-driven approach is a poor fit for enterprise software buying cycles.
Strengths
- Exceptional creative output
- Strong reactive and newsjacking capability
- Excellent UK and increasingly US consumer coverage
Where they are weaker
- Consumer-oriented, weak fit for B2B software
- Campaign risk is higher by design
- UK-weighted media relationships
Thrive Internet Marketing
A large full-service agency where digital PR is one line item among many. Convenient when you want one vendor for paid, SEO, content and PR, and less specialized than any of the dedicated firms above. Worth noting their own roundup on this topic scores themselves 97 out of 100 and every competitor lower, which tells you something about how these lists are usually constructed.
Strengths
- One vendor across several channels
- Large team and broad capability
- Established with a long client list
Where they are weaker
- PR is not the core specialism
- No published pricing
- Bundled retainers make it hard to see what PR actually costs
All 10 compared
| Agency | Best for | Pricing |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Authority Magnet | B2B software and SaaS | From $5,000/mo, published |
| 2. Fractl | data-led campaigns and earned links | ~$10,000 to $30,000/mo |
| 3. Digital Third Coast | research-led campaigns on a mid-market budget | ~$8,000 to $20,000/mo |
| 4. Siege Media | evergreen content that earns links over time | ~$10,000 to $30,000/mo |
| 5. PRWiz | a guaranteed floor under an unpredictable campaign | Per placement, no retainer |
| 6. PRLab | B2B tech across US and European markets | ~$5,000 to $15,000/mo |
| 7. Go Fish Digital | combining PR with reputation management | ~$8,000 to $20,000/mo |
| 8. Idea Grove | traditional B2B tech media relations | ~$10,000 to $25,000/mo |
| 9. Rise at Seven | creative consumer campaigns | ~$10,000 to $30,000/mo |
| 10. Thrive Internet Marketing | PR bundled into a wider marketing retainer | Not published |
What digital PR should be measured on for SaaS
Weak measures
- Logo reels of national outlets. Impressive in a deck. Rarely read by anyone evaluating B2B software.
- Total reach or impressions. A number built from publisher-claimed traffic figures.
- Clip counts. Ten mentions in irrelevant outlets beats nothing by very little.
- Domain Rating of covering sites. The easiest metric in the category to inflate.
What to measure instead
- Referring domains from publications your buyers read. Trade beats national for software.
- Inclusion in category roundups. The single highest-value placement for SaaS.
- Movement in AI citation share. Baseline before the campaign or the number means nothing.
- Branded search volume. The clearest signal coverage reached actual buyers.
- Pipeline attributed to first touch. Needs CRM fields set up before the campaign starts.
Best for software. Fractl is better for almost everything else.
We placed ourselves first for B2B software and named a competitor best overall, because for a consumer brand wanting national coverage from a research campaign that is simply true. What we do better for software is find the story inside data the client already has, usage patterns, benchmarks and category trends, rather than commissioning a survey to manufacture one.
- Stories built from your own data, not a commissioned survey with a predetermined conclusion
- AI citation share baselined first, so campaign impact on AI answers is provable
- Honest hit-rate reporting. Pitches sent, responses, placements, and the ones that failed
- We will tell you when a competitor fits better, which for consumer campaigns is most of the time
The caveat we keep on every page: our flagship case studies are high-ticket B2B and e-commerce, not named SaaS logos. On earned coverage specifically, the campaign that produced 294 placements and 1,114 top-three keywords is the work to judge us on.
Does the agency's location matter?
When it genuinely does
- Local and regional coverage. Getting into a Dallas or Sacramento business journal is a relationships game, and those relationships are geographic.
- Broadcast and national press. Time zone overlap with newsrooms matters more than agencies admit when a story is moving.
- Regulated categories. Financial and health coverage carries jurisdiction-specific rules that a foreign agency will not know.
When it does not
- Trade and industry publications. Editors care about the story, not the sender's postcode.
- Data-led campaigns. A study is pitched by email and judged on the data.
- Category roundups and comparison pages. The placements that matter most for software have no geographic component at all.
We operate from India for clients in the US, UK and Canada, so this question is asked of us regularly. For B2B software the honest answer is that it rarely matters: the coverage that moves pipeline is trade press, category roundups and comparison pages, all pitched by email and judged on substance. If you need a producer at a national broadcaster to take a call, hire someone in that market. We would tell you the same on a call.
Which digital PR agency is the best?
How much does a digital PR agency cost?
What is the difference between digital PR and traditional PR?
Is digital PR worth it for B2B SaaS?
How long does digital PR take to show results?
Can you guarantee media coverage?
Why does every 'best digital PR agencies' list rank the author first?
Selling software?
Then the shortlist is shorter than this page suggests. Tell us the product and what data you already collect, and we will tell you whether there is a story in it.
From $5,000/mo · Month to month · Reply within 24h